“Collective violence and human trafficking to become pressing safety issues” 06-02-2007 In the coming years, collective violence and human trafficking will be the
two most pressing challenges for cities. Mr Marcus, director of the European
Forum for Urban Safety, expressed this opinion when talking about urban security
and crime prevention. Another important issue is improving European police
cooperation – in his view, bilateral agreements should be leading.
In the field of security and crime prevention, what will be, in your
opinion, the main issue in European cities for the coming years?
In my opinion two issues will be prevalent in the coming years.
Firstly, there is the problem of collective violence – mostly occurring
around big public events such as football games or musical concerts. This
collective violence is different from other public unrest, such as the French
suburban riots. Those riots could be explained for a large part on social and
economical exclusion. The collective violence I am referring to seems to be more
an expression of frustration.
Secondly, the trafficking of human beings is something that needs more
attention. Especially the trafficking of human beings with sexual aims is now
largely taking place out of the sight of society. There are data about illegal
immigrants working in the labour market. These data do not exist for people that
are trafficked to work in the sex industry. Organised crime is involved in most
of the cases. To be able to fight this problem, coordination between cities is
absolutely necessary.
What issues are not yet sufficiently addressed at this point of
time?
The cooperation between police force’s of different countries should be
further developed and improved. A general European framework for police
cooperation is so far not working. The current way in which the EU has organised
police cooperation is, in my opinion, a failure. Countries should be able to
make bilateral agreements on police cooperation. And these bilateral agreements
should be leading.
Another problem is that of judicial cooperation. In Europe, there is a
general understanding of what’s a crime and what not. However, there are big
differences in the idea of what the ‘hierarchy of crimes’ is. What is considered
a priority in Eastern Europe can be tolerated in North Western Europe. In
Southern Europe the priority is, again, on something completely different. This
is makes cooperation on the EU level very challenging.
Finally, the cooperation between local authorities should be improved. A lot
of the safety, security and crime prevention policies are developed and
implemented on the local level. This local level is, however, not sufficiently
represented in the European Union policy process.
How and to what extent can a network like European Forum for Urban Safety
contribute to making European cities safer?
In the first place we consult the European institutions on all issues
relating to Urban Safety. Urban safety should be taken into consideration in all
relevant policy fields. We have to lobby for our cities to be heard on the
European level. It is one of our goals to, for example, explicitly integrate the
concepts of security and crime prevention into the European ‘urban policy’.
Our second role is to bring cities together. If we want to cooperate, it is
important to develop a common vision and a common approach on safety issues. For
this, a lot of direct contact, discussion and reflection are needed.
Finally, what message would you like to put forward to our audience of
urban professionals and policy makers?
I am looking forward to the further discussions on the future of the EU and
the future EU constitution or EU treaty. In the version of the EU constitution
that was rejected by French and Dutch voters, there was a lot said about a
European crime prevention policy. I wonder what a future treaty will include on
this topic.
LinksFor more information, visit the European Forum for Urban Safety website back |


