.
BEdotCYdotDEdotDKdotESdotFIdotFRdotGRdotHUdotITdotLUdotNLdotPLdotPTdotROdotSEdotUKdot
 
European Urban Knowledge Network
Home eukn.org
 
Home > E-library > Urban Policy > Economy knowledge & employment > Research & innovation > ...
 
Print pageContactSitemap
-
  • E-library
  • Share your knowledge!
  • Research Services
  • About EUKN
  • News
  • Meetings
-
-
-
-Search site
Zoeken

Advanced search
-
-
Cases

Examples of Region...Regio Stars Awards...OPUS Project in Fi...more
Supporting the dev...How to Evaluate a ...How do I make the ...When is the right ...Regional Innovatio...Starters cluster, ...Knowledge Pearl - ...

Researches
Report COST ACTION...An Explorative Stu...SoftGIS in Finlandmore
The rise of knowle...Cluster Management...Cities and the Lis...The need for a new...The Triple HelixInnovation potenti...

Policies

STRIKE Report - Ci...Programme for the ...The Accessibility ...more
Innovative City® P...
Networks
Baltic Metropoles ...Cities in Transiti...Creative Regions N...more
Living Labs Europe

-
How do I evaluate?
Introduction
The aim is to minimise ‘bias’, which can be created by the method used or the way the method is used. This is a key good practice principle, because it is important to be able to assess the level of confidence in your results.
Problem
This should be read in conjunction with 'how do I make the most out of the evaluation?' A stakeholders analysis can be conducted with each of your stakeholder groups to identify those who they believe should be involved.
Accessing those group who are sometimes called ‘hard-to-reach’ may involve different methods that are sensitive and appeal to their involvement. With a large number of potential participants you may wish to use a system that gives an equal opportunity of being chosen.
Description
It is essential to assess the potential strengths and weaknesses of each method of evaluation to ensure that the information required can be achieved, providing that the evaluator has the appropriate level of skill. This is also important in terms of maintaining funder or contractor confidence.
The aim is to minimise ‘bias’, which can be created by the method used or the way the method is used. This is a key good practice principle, because it is important to be able to assess the level of confidence in your results.
Approach
Methods of evaluation usually fall in to two categories: quantitative – facts and figures and qualitative – reasons, explanations and opinions.
Methods of evaluation include:
  • Statistical data collection, document review – what are other evaluations saying?
  • Project management information – what effects are organisational structure and processes having?
  • Participative methods – story telling, case study, drawing and describing, visioning and timelines.
Each can be built upon or repeated to demonstrate change, Interviews – structured, semi-structured, focus groups. Focus groups can be used for identifying questions for other techniques, group or individual logbooks, observational studies, questionnaires – postal or face-to-face.
Results
For larger scale projects, it may be possible to consider issues of sampling. Sampling is used to make inferences about a population from a relatively small number of observations that are assumed to be representative of the population.
A ‘sampling frame’ is a list of the elements you are trying to sample – for example, postcodes for household surveys. The key question is – how large does the sample need to be?
Beneficiaries
Organisations and communities
Resources used
This should be read in conjunction with 'how do I make the most out of the evaluation?' and 'when is the right time to evaluate?'
Contact info
Regen West Midlands
enquiries@regenwm.org
Project start date
//
Links
Visit the Regen West Midlands websiteRead the 'How do I evaluate?' Report (ASP)

File without description

Document type
case
Themes
Urban Policy > Economy knowledge & employment
Keywords
Research & innovation, Training
 


-
Copyright-Masthead-Disclaimer-Privacy-RSS feed-EU-Eurocities-Urbact