.
BEdotCYdotDEdotDKdotESdotFIdotFRdotGRdotHUdotITdotLUdotNLdotPLdotPTdotROdotSEdotUKdot
 
European Urban Knowledge Network
Home eukn.org
 
Home > E-library > Urban Policy > Economy knowledge & employment > Urban economy > Competitiveness > ...
 
Print pageContactSitemap
-
  • E-library
  • Share your knowledge!
  • Research Services
  • About EUKN
  • News
  • Meetings
-
-
-
-Search site
Zoeken

Advanced search
-
-
Cases

Helsinki School of...Multidisciplinary ...Better Concept: fr...
Researches
Human Capital and ...The Rise of the Sk...The Relationship b...
-
Urban Density and the Rate of Invention
Introduction
This paper examines the role local labour markets play in the production of innovations.
Description
The researchers appeal to a labour market matching model to argue that in dense urban areas, workers are more selective in their matches and are therefore more productive.
They argue that the inventive output of cities is explained in part by the productivity of worker interactions within firms.
Background information
With the emergence of endogenous growth theory in the 1980s, externalities associated with knowledge spillovers have played a prominent role in thinking about the sustained economic growth of nations.
A number of studies attempt to document the existence and significance of localized knowledge spillovers. Many of these rely on a “blackbox” model, applying an economy-wide knowledge production function to spatial data.
Some recent work has explored the relationship between city size, productivity, and inventive potential, but the relationship between employment density and invention remains largely unexamined.
Methodology
The research team explicitly examined the role of employment density on the rate of innovation across metropolitan areas. They used the average rate of patenting per capita—what we call patent intensity—in a metropolitan area as a measure of innovations in these areas.
Conclusions
The researchers have found that, all else equal, patent intensity (patents per capita) is 20 percent higher in a metropolitan area with an employment density (jobs per square mile) twice that of another metropolitan area. Since local employment density doubles nearly four times across our sample, the implied gains in inventive output are substantial.
In addition, they found evidence of an optimal employment density, i.e., one that maximizes patent intensity, of about 2,150 jobs per square mile-roughly the level of Baltimore or Philadelphia. They also found that, all else equal, a city with a more competitive market structure, or one that is not too large (a population less than 1 million) will have a higher patent intensity.
These findings confirm the widely held view that the nation's densest locations play an important role in creating the flow of ideas that generate innovation and growth.
Contact info
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
Robert Hunt (Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia - Research Department), tel. +1 2155743806
Publication date
//
Project finished
01/04/2005
Researcher
Gerald Carlino, Satyajit Chatterjee and Robert Hunt
Download the full research “Matching and Learning in Cities” (Eng, PDF, 181 KB)

Document type
research
Themes
Urban Policy > Economy knowledge & employment > Urban economy
Keywords
Competitiveness
 


-
Copyright-Masthead-Disclaimer-Privacy-RSS feed-EU-Eurocities-Urbact