.
BEdotCYdotDEdotDKdotESdotFIdotFRdotGRdotHUdotITdotLUdotNLdotPLdotPTdotROdotSEdotUKdot
 
European Urban Knowledge Network
Home eukn.org
 
Home > E-library > Urban Policy > Housing > Case study housing - Vienna, Austr...
 
Print pageContactSitemap
-
  • E-library
  • Share your knowledge!
  • Research Services
  • About EUKN
  • News
  • Meetings
-
-
-
-Search site
Zoeken

Advanced search
-
-
Cases

Suurpelto Project ...The renewal of Ams...First housing chec...more
Case study on hous...Case study on hous...Case study housing...Case study on hous...Brescia housing pr...Case study on hous...The global renovat...

Researches
Emerging Trends in...The impact of the ...Raise the roof, lo...more
Identity key when ...The Expatriate Rea...'Sense of place' r...Buy-to-Let and Buy...2006 Statistical A...Promoting Respect....Lower income group...

Policies

Architects launch ...European Housing R...Mega-Events, Olymp...more
Social housing and...UN-HABITAT Global ...National Action Pl...Housing in 2020CoR report on Hous...The Urban Programm...Integrative Urban ...
Networks
CECODHAS, the Euro...
-
Case study housing - Vienna, Austria: Soft Urban Renewal
Introduction
The City of Vienna decided against demolition and construction of new urban areas, and against the displacement or compulsory re-housing of the population living in renewal areas. The model of soft urban renewal is an interdisciplinary challenge, which combines social, economic, cultural and ecological demands. The measures are future-oriented and reflect the city as a system.
Problem
Soft urban renewal pursues the goal of liniking affordable housing with economic use of resources, mixed use, and the adaptation to the existing infrastructure. The re-conversion and upgrading of the existing urban structure is counter-posed to demolition and new building. It places the residents in the foreground so as to minimize repression frequently induced by improvement activities. Owners and residents are involved in the progress. Thus the actors of urban renewal are: the municipality (MA 50 and Wohnfonds of the City of Vienna, Area Renewal Offices), private and public landlords, owners and tenants (migrants and native population). Urban renewal also tries to create new green spaces on small areas which are unused and in the courts, because a constant problem is the lack of green spaces in many renewal areas. The political aim is to preserve and improve as many old buildings as possible as long as it is economical to do so. As old stock provides cheaper housing it is not so important to achieve the standard of quality that new a new dwelling would offer. Renewal consists of more than technical measures. Typical area improvement schemes have to consider such problems as unemployment, crime rate, ethnic tensions, drug addiction etc. Those social problems cannot be solved by building programs alone. Thus area based renewal requires a decentralization of decision, but at the same time and interdisciplinary approach to existing problems.
Description
Soft urban renewal is an excellent example of how a cost-intensive project is easily prepared with reasonably priced planning measures. Currently, more than 150,000 apaprtments have been renewed with public subsidies, one sixth of the total housing stock. This means that soft urban renewal is one of the world's leading tenant-oriented urban renewal programmes. 1974 was the foundation of the first area renewal ofice and the strategy of soft urban renewal was developed. In 1984 the subsidized renewal programme started and the WBSF was founded. 1989 the decentralization of Austrian housing policies to the provinces took place. Urban renewal does not only mean to invest in the rehabilitation of the housing stock but it also implies improvement of the infrastructure such as open spaces and investitions in public transport.
Researcher: Josef Kohlbacher, Institute for Urban and Regional Research, Vienna
Approach
Main emphasis is placed on so-called base improvement, that is on maintaining, improving and modernizing existing housing structures in coordination with residents. The legal foundations such as amendments to the tenancy laws were laid long before the improvement activities. Renewal schemes target on those already living in the areas considering their (financial) possibilities. A step to step approach is used. It follows a careful survey of existing problems and include self-help activities. The measures also stengthen local business and provide new jobs in the areas.
Results
  • 7,560 buildings had been applied for renewal with public assistance;
  • 3,800 residential buildings with 181,000 apaprtments were approved;
  • 2,160 buildings with 142,000 apartments were completed.
  • From 1984 to 2001 the category of substandard dwellings was reduced from approximately 320,000 (39% of the total stock) to less than 125,000.
  • The number of fully equipped apartments rose from about 328,000 to more than 715,000.
  • One important result was the avoidance of social segregation and gentrification.
  • The renewal activities produced a large stock of affordable rehabilitated housing with avoiding a forced change of ownership structures.
Beneficiaries
There is a distribution of responsibilities between owners and tenants and an emphasis on tenants' participation. Both groups, tenants and house-owners benefit from the renewal activities. Positive effects are also considerable for the local business which provides new jobs in renewal areas.
Resources used
The source of funding are subsidies granted by the City of Vienna. The whole investments where approximately US $ 2,40 billion for completed projects. The public investments were US $ 2,51 billion.
Contact info
City of Vienna
Vienna
http://www.wien.gv.at/english/
Dr. Wolfgang Förster (Head of Municipal Department 50), tel. 43-1-4000-74813
Project start date
//2007
Click here to read the entire case study on housing in Vienna, Austria (PDF, Eng, 1.35 MB)

Document type
case
Themes
Urban Policy
Keywords
Housing
 


-
Copyright-Masthead-Disclaimer-Privacy-RSS feed-EU-Eurocities-Urbact