.
BEdotCYdotDEdotDKdotESdotFIdotFRdotGRdotHUdotITdotLUdotNLdotPLdotPTdotROdotSEdotUKdot
 
European Urban Knowledge Network
Home eukn.org
 
Home > E-library > Urban Policy > Social inclusion & integration > Community development > Citizens' participation > ...
 
Print pageContactSitemap
-
  • E-library
  • Share your knowledge!
  • Research Services
  • About EUKN
  • News
  • Meetings
-
-
-
-Search site
Zoeken

Advanced search
-
-
Cases

“Urban Herculaneum...Residents vote on ...Rotterdam citizens...more
Hamlet GalleryCitizens' particip...Citizen Channel in...Living Cityspace –...Urban Regeneration...Involving the loca...Guardians of Acces...

Researches
Community engageme...Resident participa...Democratic governa...more
Immigration and Lo...Fostering communit...Social Infrastruct...Community Engageme...Creating a Learnin...Network Support Fu...Searching for Soli...

Policies

Participatory demo...GoldStar Exemplar ...Irish MEP's report...more
How to develop a l...PAN 81: Community ...Closer to peopleihminen@turku - Ci...Local Agenda 21 in...
Networks
URBACT Partecipand...
-
Urban leadership and community involvement
Introduction
This paper describes political leadership and community involvement, when reflecting on the empirical shapes and normative challenges of urban governance.
Description
This project pays particular attention to two dimensions of governance: the dimension of modes of coordination (horizontal vs. vertical) and the dimension of access (broad inclusion vs. small organizational networks). This research moves towards a succinct account of what could be relevant context factors for shifting the balance between government and governance. Taking into account the position of local governments in the overall political system and the different ways of institutionalizing the position of the democratically elected leader. Furthermore this paper will present several empirical examples of how leadership and community involvement are co-influencing parts in different approaches to modernize local policy making. The following cases were researched: Bristol (UK), Bergen (Norway), Cinisello Balsamo (Italy) and Heidelberg (Germany).
EU involvement
This paper resulted from cooperation within the EU funded research project “Participation, Leadership and Urban Sustainability” (PLUS)
Conclusions
The small selection of policy initiatives presented in this paper illustrates some measure of the variation in urban leaders’ approaches to community involvement – and in the responses of the community actors to these approaches:
• In the district of Bergen, the approach of politicians and managers can best be described as kind requests made towards nongovernmental actors in the urban district to express their views and discuss measures without committing themselves further.
• In Italy, Cinisello, early attempts to delimit community involvement to non-committing consultations were foiled by demands for real influence.
• In the United Kingdom, Bristol, there was a failure to even solicit the required “quota” of involvement, not least due to inadequate management.
• in Germany, Heidelberg an elaborate, long term scheme of extensive community involvement in all districts has been developed.
Contact info
College of Urban planning & public affairs
Michael Haus
Publication date
01/01/2004
Researcher
Michael Haus and Jan Erling Klausen
Links
Urban leadership and community involvement

Urban leadership and community involvement (PDF, Eng, 1.3mb)

Document type
research
Themes
Urban Policy > Social inclusion & integration > Community development
Keywords
Citizens' participation
 


-
Copyright-Masthead-Disclaimer-Privacy-RSS feed-EU-Eurocities-Urbact