.
BEdotCYdotDEdotDKdotESdotFIdotFRdotGRdotHUdotITdotLUdotNLdotPLdotPTdotROdotSEdotUKdot
 
European Urban Knowledge Network
Home eukn.org
 
Home > E-library > Urban Policy > Social inclusion & integration > Community development > Citizens' participation > ...
 
Print pageContactSitemap
-
  • E-library
  • Share your knowledge!
  • Research Services
  • About EUKN
  • News
  • Meetings
-
-
-
-Search site
Zoeken

Advanced search
-
-
Cases

“Urban Herculaneum...Residents vote on ...Rotterdam citizens...more
Hamlet GalleryCitizens' particip...Citizen Channel in...Living Cityspace –...Urban Regeneration...Involving the loca...Guardians of Acces...

Researches
Community engageme...Resident participa...Democratic governa...more
Immigration and Lo...Fostering communit...Social Infrastruct...Community Engageme...Creating a Learnin...Network Support Fu...Searching for Soli...

Policies

Participatory demo...GoldStar Exemplar ...Irish MEP's report...more
How to develop a l...PAN 81: Community ...Closer to peopleihminen@turku - Ci...Local Agenda 21 in...
Networks
URBACT Partecipand...
-
Community participation – who benefits?
Introduction
Politicians around the world are interested in finding new ways to involve people in making decisions about the way public servies in their area are run. This report explores whether policies to involve people are effective in building strong social networks. The question at hand: Do policies to promote community participation in governance build social capital? One of the main findings is that as a result of these policies those already well connected tend to get better connected. The report identifies a number of 'barriers to entry' for those not involved in governance. It proposes some valuable solutions to raise levels public involvement on the one hand, and, on the other hand, to improve the contributions of those already participating.
Description
Government has made a significant investment in community participation on the back of evidence suggesting that it builds stronger networks between people who live in the same neighbourhood. However, this report questions the accuracy of this belief and looks at whether community dynamics and relationships can in fact make good governance hard to achieve.
Background information
Since its election in 1997, the Labour Government has set particular store by community participation in its public service reforms, resulting in a plethora of new structures and initiatives.
The breadth, coverage and sheer number of community participation arrangements right across the public services represent a considerable investment, not just of the Government’s political capital, but also of communities’ scarce resources, time, energy and hope.
It is therefore right to assess whether these structures are proving to be a good use of those resources by living up to the promises made on their behalf.
Methodology
The report draws upon detailed case studies from two areas in the UK as well as a review of other relevant research and literature. Case studies were identified through examining demographic data and the Indices of Deprivation.
The two areas were chosen to be broadly comparable in terms of demographic data and types and levels of deprivation. Extended visits were undertaken to the two case study areas involving a mixture of individual qualitative research interviews and informal focus group research.
Research participants were identified through a process of selecting key individuals playing particular roles within their communities.
Conclusions
The authors conclude that community participation tends to be dominated by a small group of people and suggest ways in which formal participation arrangements could more effectively engage with informal everyday social networks.
The fact that relatively few people choose to participate in formal governance does not mean we should discard the ambition of community participation, but rather that we should recast it.
Contact info
Joseph Rowntree Foundation
publications@jrf.org.uk
Publication date
01/07/2006
Researcher
Demos: Paul Skidmore, Kirsten Bound and Hannah Lownsbrough
Article info
ISBN: 978 1 85935 521 3

Links
Visit the Joseph Rowntree Foundation website

Download the "Community participation" Report (PDF, Eng, 504 KB)

Document type
research
Themes
Urban Policy > Social inclusion & integration > Community development
Keywords
Citizens' participation
 


-
Copyright-Masthead-Disclaimer-Privacy-RSS feed-EU-Eurocities-Urbact