.
BEdotCYdotDEdotDKdotESdotFIdotFRdotGRdotHUdotITdotLUdotNLdotPLdotPTdotROdotSEdotUKdot
 
European Urban Knowledge Network
Home eukn.org
 
Home > E-library > Urban Policy > Social inclusion & integration > Community development > Citizens' participation > ...
 
Print pageContactSitemap
-
  • E-library
  • Share your knowledge!
  • Research Services
  • About EUKN
  • News
  • Meetings
-
-
-
-Search site
Zoeken

Advanced search
-
-
Cases

“Urban Herculaneum...Residents vote on ...Rotterdam citizens...more
Hamlet GalleryCitizens' particip...Citizen Channel in...Living Cityspace –...Urban Regeneration...Involving the loca...Guardians of Acces...

Researches
Community engageme...Resident participa...Democratic governa...more
Immigration and Lo...Fostering communit...Social Infrastruct...Community Engageme...Creating a Learnin...Network Support Fu...Searching for Soli...

Policies

Participatory demo...GoldStar Exemplar ...Irish MEP's report...more
How to develop a l...PAN 81: Community ...Closer to peopleihminen@turku - Ci...Local Agenda 21 in...
Networks
URBACT Partecipand...
-
Continuing and improving integration in Utrecht
Introduction
In 1997 the Utrecht MIX began the interculturalisation policy. This policy has been evaluated in order to determine what shape the policy should take in the future. The evaluation indicated the importance of proceeding with the Utrecht policy and to optimise it with respect to a number of aspects. To accomplish this three points of action have been established, these being; a more unambiguous policy, more focus on results and better positioning.
Description
Utrecht opts for an unambiguous integration policy focusing on bringing together the indigenous population and the immigrant population, social and cultural rejuvenation and combating disadvantages. Bilateralism is key here; both the indigenous and the immigrant population must make efforts towards achieving successful integration. This bilateral integration policy is based upon three interventions, the three Ts: Toerusting, Toegankelijkheid and Toenadering (Equipping, Accessibility and Rapprochement).
The individual migrant is ‘equipped’ to be able to function fully and independently in society. Utrecht creates the conditions to enable the newcomers to complete the integration course. By ‘accessibility’, Utrecht refers to what was originally meant by interculturalisation. Dutch organisations must make efforts to deliver goods and services that are also geared towards new groups of citizens. In addition, they must give them an equal place among their own workforce. ‘Rapprochement’ means exchange, dialogue and meeting between the various cultures which make up our society. It encompasses the social and cultural rejuvenation of the Dutch culture.
Conclusions
It is important to improve the steering and evaluation of the integration policy. Objectives must therefore be highlighted, clear-cut agreements must be made, monitoring improved and accountability accentuated. In addition the positioning of the integration policy should be firmly anchored. The integration policy requires an integrated approach and will begin with the City Council. There could also be more effective cooperation within the official programme organisations. Social organisations such as the MIU (Multicultural Institute Utrecht), Saluti and migrants' self-help organisations participate in policy development and are partners in the implementation of the policy. This ensures broadly based support within the policy.
Contact info
City of Utrecht, Social Development Section
M. el Filali, tel. +31 30 2862883
Publication date
01/11/2004
Researcher
City of Utrecht, Social Development Section
Links
City of Utrecht

Continuing and improving integration in Utrecht. Policy aimed at Equipping, Accessibility and Rapprochement (PDF, Dutch, 54KB)

Document type
research
Themes
Urban Policy > Social inclusion & integration > Community development
Keywords
Citizens' participation
 


-
Copyright-Masthead-Disclaimer-Privacy-RSS feed-EU-Eurocities-Urbact