.
BEdotCYdotDEdotDKdotESdotFIdotFRdotGRdotHUdotITdotLUdotNLdotPLdotPTdotROdotSEdotUKdot
 
European Urban Knowledge Network
Home eukn.org
 
Home > E-library > Urban Policy > Social inclusion & integration > Community development > Citizens' participation > ...
 
Print pageContactSitemap
-
  • E-library
  • Share your knowledge!
  • Research Services
  • About EUKN
  • News
  • Meetings
-
-
-
-Search site
Zoeken

Advanced search
-
-
Cases

“Urban Herculaneum...Residents vote on ...Rotterdam citizens...more
Hamlet GalleryCitizens' particip...Citizen Channel in...Living Cityspace –...Urban Regeneration...Involving the loca...Guardians of Acces...

Researches
Community engageme...Resident participa...Democratic governa...more
Immigration and Lo...Fostering communit...Social Infrastruct...Community Engageme...Creating a Learnin...Network Support Fu...Searching for Soli...

Policies

Participatory demo...GoldStar Exemplar ...Irish MEP's report...more
How to develop a l...PAN 81: Community ...Closer to peopleihminen@turku - Ci...Local Agenda 21 in...
Networks
URBACT Partecipand...
-
The Neighbourhood Matters
Introduction
With the aid of results from the "Maastricht Quality of Life Study", this report describes how low socio-economic status and limited social capital are related to differences in quality of life and intellectual health among the Maastricht neighbourhoods.
Description
Is there a relationship between the low socio-economic status (SES) and limited social capital of a neighbourhood on the one hand, and differences in the quality of life and health in the neighbourhood on the other? The report indicates that there is more social capital in neighbourhoods with a higher SES.
  • Children (11-year olds) who lived in neighbourhoods with a higher SES or with more social capital, appeared to feel more healthy. Moreover, in neighbourhoods where residents would intervene if something happened, for instance to separate fighting children, the children were intellectually more healthy and also better-behaved. These links were not found in 13/14-year olds. However, subgroups of 13/14–year-old adolescents with highly educated parents, adolescents who lived in neighbourhoods where there was frequent house moving, were found to be at a disadvantage if they lived in a more impoverished neighbourhood.
  • Adults also appeared to have a lower quality of life if they lived in impoverished neighbourhoods and this could be explained by their opinions about sociability and social contacts in the neighbourhood. Adults also scored better for quality of life if they lived in neighbourhoods that had more social capital.
Conclusions
The report shows that residents in neighbourhoods with more social capital feel better. Moreover, there are indications that more social capital in poorer neighbourhoods can diminish the negative effects of neighbourhood poverty on well-being.
One recommendation is to concentrate on the retention of social capital in the neighbourhoods or even to provide facilities to increase social capital. Several items will have to be further elaborated in consultation with policymakers.
Contact info
University of Maastricht
Ms M. Drukker, tel. +31 43 3299782
Publication date
18/03/2005
Researcher
Drukker, M., F. Feron, J. van Os
Links
University of Maastricht

De buurt doet ertoe (PDF, Dut, 730 KB)

Document type
research
Themes
Urban Policy > Social inclusion & integration > Community development
Keywords
Citizens' participation
 


-
Copyright-Masthead-Disclaimer-Privacy-RSS feed-EU-Eurocities-Urbact