.
BEdotCYdotDEdotDKdotESdotFIdotFRdotGRdotHUdotITdotLUdotNLdotPLdotPTdotROdotSEdotUKdot
 
European Urban Knowledge Network
Home eukn.org
 
Home > E-library > Urban Policy > Social inclusion & integration > Community development > ...
 
Print pageContactSitemap
-
  • E-library
  • Share your knowledge!
  • Research Services
  • About EUKN
  • News
  • Meetings
-
-
-
-Search site
Zoeken

Advanced search
-
-
Cases

K'Cidade improves ...Well begun...mento...Neighbourhood Rege...more
Urban renewal in N...European Neighbour...The City in BalanceLivestock fairs in...LKC Awards 2006Ardler Village Tru...Alness Environment...

Researches
Ethnic diversity r...The Consequences o...Special Improvemen...more
The New (and Old) ...Promoting Sustaina...Social Quartet - C...Community organisa...Learning Point 7: ...Developing Buildin...Key steps to susta...

Policies

Citizen participat...Learning to change...Creating sustainab...more
A new commitment t...
Networks
Knowledge Network,...
-
Urban regeneration through partnership: A critical appraisal
Introduction
Introduction This document is a summary of the main conclusions of a study of 27 partnerships in nine city-regions, identifying key lessons for better partnership, and critical issues about policy and governance which affect the future of Britain's cities.
Description
This document summarises the key conclusions of a study examining factors which influence the effectiveness of Britain's urban regeneration partnerships, and how they work within the emerging national policy context.
Case studies were carried out in 27 partnerships in eight city-regions in England and Scotland and in the Welsh Valleys. In each of these, a 'cluster' of partnerships was examined: a regional or sub-regional, a city-wide and one or more local partnerships. In addition to factors of effectiveness, what are called the 'foundations' of partnership were also examined.
Background information
An enduring need for urban regeneration despite thirty years of regeneration activity raises the question of whether we are organising ourselves as a society sufficiently to achieve regeneration over the next thirty.
Although there has been an explosion in the 1990s in the use of partnership as a means to regeneration, not enough is known about why some partnerships are effective and others are not. This document summarises a study which aimed to explore this issue.
Methodology
The study looked at 27 regeneration partnerships in nine city-regions:
  • East London and Newham,
  • Birmingham,
  • Greater Manchester,
  • South Yorkshire and Sheffield,
  • the Tees Valley and Middlesbrough,
  • the Welsh Valleys and Rhondda Cynon Taff,
  • Lanarkshire,
  • Glasgow and Edinburgh.
Conclusions
  • Local leadership and practical, long-term vision are vital in developing consensus.
  • A concerted effort is needed to involve business – few partnerships had real business involvement.
  • Regeneration programmes should: budget for community capacity building from the start; ensure that partners understand the need for community development; enter into formal regeneration and service quality agreements, or community plans; and measure success in terms of community skills and residents' views.
  • Important tasks are to develop a clear corporate approach in the local authority, and to promote local democracy and neighbourhood initiatives within a council decentralisation programme.
Contact info
Joseph Rowntree Foundation
publications@jrf.org.uk
Publication date
//
Project finished
//2000
Researcher
The research team was led by Professor Michael Carley at Heriot-Watt University, with Mike Chapman and Karryn Kirk; and Annette Hastings, Raymond Young, Alison More and Jo Dean at Glasgow University.
Links
Visit the Joseph Rowntree Foundation website

Download the 'Urban regeneration through partnership' Report (PDF, Eng, 42 KB)

Document type
research
Themes
Urban Policy > Social inclusion & integration
Keywords
Community development
 


-
Copyright-Masthead-Disclaimer-Privacy-RSS feed-EU-Eurocities-Urbact