.
BEdotCYdotDEdotDKdotESdotFIdotFRdotGRdotHUdotITdotLUdotNLdotPLdotPTdotROdotSEdotUKdot
 
European Urban Knowledge Network
Home eukn.org
 
Home > E-library > Urban Policy > Social inclusion & integration > Quality of life > Health > ...
 
Print pageContactSitemap
-
  • E-library
  • Share your knowledge!
  • Research Services
  • About EUKN
  • News
  • Meetings
-
-
-
-Search site
Zoeken

Advanced search
-
-
Cases

Proper nutrition n...Case studies of ph...
Researches
The Role of Built ...Nutrition in Finla...Functional Ability...
-
Fat City: questioning the relationship between urban sprawl and obesity
Introduction
Obesity is one of today’s top public health concerns and its prevalence has increased dramatically over the last two decades. In the late 1970’s, 12.7% of men and 17% of women were medically obese. By 2000 these proportions had risen to 27.7% and 34% respectively. Large spatial differences in the incidence of obesity have led many to claim that variations in the built environment, by affecting exercise and diet, may have a large impact on obesity. Compact neighborhoods may induce people to use their cars less often than those where buildings are scattered. However, before we rush to redesign neighborhoods, it is important to note that a positive correlation between sprawl and obesity does not necessarily imply that sprawl causes obesity or that reducing sprawl will lead people to lose weight.
Description
This paper studies the relationship between urban sprawl and obesity. Using data that tracks individuals over time, the authors find no evidence that urban sprawl causes obesity. It is shown that previous findings of a positive relationship most likely reflect a failure to properly control for the fact the individuals who are more likely to be obese choose to live in more sprawling neighborhoods. The results indicate that current interest in changing the built environment to counter the rise in obesity is misguided.
Methodology
The primary measure of obesity is Body Mass Index (bmi), which allows comparisons of weight holding height constant. This index is calculated by dividing an individual’s weight in kilograms by his or her height in meters squared, i.e., kg/m2. The authorsl use bmi as measure of obesity.
Conclusions
The results strongly suggest that urban sprawl does not cause weight gain. Rather, people who are more likely to be obese (e.g., because they do not like to walk) are also more likely to move to sprawling neighborhoods (e.g., because they can more easily move around by car). Of course the built environment may still place constraints on the type of exercise that people are able to take or the nature of the diet that they consume. The key point is that individuals who have a lower propensity to being obese will choose to avoid those kinds of neighborhoods. Overall, there is no evidence that neighborhood characteristics have any causal effect on weight.
It follows from the results that recent calls to redesign cities in order to combat the rise in obesity are misguided. The results do not provide a basis for thinking that such redesigns will have the desired effect, and therefore suggest that resources devoted to this cause will be wasted. The public health battle against obesity is better fought on other fronts.
Contact info
Jean Eid
Publication date
/12/2007
Researcher
Jean Eid, Henry G. Overman, Diego Puca and Matthew A. Turner
Download the full article "Fat City: questioning the relationship between urban sprawl and obesity" (PDF, Eng, 318 kB)

Document type
research
Themes
Urban Policy > Social inclusion & integration > Quality of life
Keywords
Health
 


-
Copyright-Masthead-Disclaimer-Privacy-RSS feed-EU-Eurocities-Urbact