.
BEdotCYdotDEdotDKdotESdotFIdotFRdotGRdotHUdotITdotLUdotNLdotPLdotPTdotROdotSEdotUKdot
 
European Urban Knowledge Network
Home eukn.org
 
Home > E-library > Urban Policy > Social inclusion & integration > Toolkit f...
 
Print pageContactSitemap
-
  • E-library
  • Share your knowledge!
  • Research Services
  • About EUKN
  • News
  • Meetings
-
-
-
-Search site
Zoeken

Advanced search
-
-
Cases

Social future visi...Municipal Integrat...Societal Developme...more
Pulteneytown Peopl...The Neighbourhood ...Development agenci...Assimilating the o...Mutual understandi...Children work to b...Emancipation centr...

Researches
The Challenge of S...Young people and t...Secularism or Demo...more
Policymaking relat...Albanian migration...Conference report:...Suburban scars: Au...URSPICLive together or s...The ethnic and soc...

Policies

UNCCAS Guide: Euro...How to create publ...2008 European Year...more
Including marginal...Social Network Pro...Cohesion Policy an...Report from the ON...The Danish Urban R...Cohesion Policy in...Breaking the cycle...
Networks
IMISCOE Network of...German Austrian UR...
-
Toolkit for cross-cultural cooperation in cities
Introduction
This study proposes to replace the ‘multiculturalism’ approach in urban policy making with an approach that is focused on ‘interculturalism’. Cities need to facilitate dialogue, exchange and reciprocal understanding between people of different backgrounds to remain competitive on the global stage. The study identifies strategies to help cities unlock the potential of their economic ‘diversity advantage’. The intercultural approach seems to hold potential. The concept of diversity advantage helps to identify the potential economic benefits of diversity. The authors should be weary, however, not to promote ‘interculturalism’ as a panacea in urban policy making.
Description
In order to achieve ‘diversity advantage’ for cities, intercultural exchange and innovation is key. To unlock this potential competitive advantage, cities need to invest in augmenting the skills and aptitudes of their professionals, such as ‘cultural literacy and competence.’ This approach is named ‘interculturalism’.
The study examines the connections between cultural diversity, innovation and thriving, prosperous urban communities, in relation to the economic, social and cultural mix of Britain’s population. They developed tools to harness the potential of diverse communities, and their powers of innovation, for use by policymakers, planners and practitioners. These include a set of indicators of openness to check the readiness of a city to take advantage of diversity, and the intercultural lens through which professionals can examine the familiar in a new light.
Background information
This research project was initiated by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Methodology
The study draws on local case studies and in-depth interviews with 33 intercultural innovators in seven UK cities, with comparative analysis also conducted in Europe, North America and Australasia.
The study evaluated six aspects of local activity:
  • public consultation and engagement
  • urban planning and development
  • business and entrepreneurship
  • schools
  • the arts and creative industries
  • sport
Conclusions
  • A general observation made by the authors is that cultural diversity is mostly portrayed as a problem to be solved rather than as an opportunity to be realised. The main first conclusion of the researchers is therefore that far more research, policy development and practice innovation needs to be devoted to exploring the potential benefits of diversity advantage. A change in the mindset is required. 
  • There is a lot to gain: intercultural exchange presents a largely unexplored source of new thinking. Cities that create a collective mindset to seek out new ideas, products, methods, markets, resources and alliances through the interaction of people with different cultural backgrounds will prosper. 
  • In most policy agendas too much attention is paid to ‘community cohesion’. This maintains a misunderstanding that social and economic advances can be achieved through the ‘avoidance of conflict’. While conflict is not to be sought gratuitously, it is a potential component of all human endeavour. Much greater emphasis should therefore be placed on the skills and resources necessary to manage conflict to a productive outcome. 
  • It is possible for cities to create the conditions for structured intercultural exchange, for example through intelligent design of space, targeted support of key institutions, incentives for cross-cultural projects and disincentives for divisive activities. 
  • In order to fully reap the benefits of an intercultural society, the concept should be mainstreamed in all institutions involved: central government, local government, professional associations, education, planning and regeneration agencies, as well as the voluntary and faith sector.
Contact info
COMEDIA
Charles Landry, tel. +44 1452 770624
Publication date
01/01/2006
Researcher
Phil Wood, Charles Landry and Jude Bloomfield
Article info
ISBN: 1 85935 525 0

Links
Visit the COMEDIA websiteVisit the Joseph Rowntree Foundation website

Download "Cultural diversity in Britain - A toolkit for cross-cultural co-operation" (PDF, Eng, 325 KB)

Document type
research
Themes
Urban Policy
Keywords
Social inclusion & integration, Economy knowledge & employment
 


-
Copyright-Masthead-Disclaimer-Privacy-RSS feed-EU-Eurocities-Urbact