.
BEdotCYdotDEdotDKdotESdotFIdotFRdotGRdotHUdotITdotLUdotNLdotPLdotPTdotROdotSEdotUKdot
 
European Urban Knowledge Network
Home eukn.org
 
Home > E-library > Urban Policy > Transport and infrastructure > Roads and road transport > Traffic management > ...
 
Print pageContactSitemap
-
  • E-library
  • Share your knowledge!
  • Research Services
  • About EUKN
  • News
  • Meetings
-
-
-
-Search site
Zoeken

Advanced search
-
-
Cases

Better management ...Wardle Home Zone, ...Accessibility and ...more
Intelligent and ef...Website for car sh...Ecological driving...Municipal bicycles...Columbus Project: ...Urban distribution...Goods to cities - ...

Researches
Imperfect Competit...Cost-effective Str...NETMOBIL D7 “EU Po...more
Breakthrough techn...Towards Sustainabl...Accessibility of l...Urban transportati...Mobility Managemen...Car-free areas and...

Policies

Strategic Plans an...Metropolitan Trans...Reclaiming city st...Networks
Spanish Cities for...
-
Monitoring Urban Accessibility 2004
Introduction
In the framework of the Policy on Large Cities (GSB), there is a need for objective and subjective indicators for the accessibility of large cities. Objective indicator: the average (experienced) travelling time to and from a large city. Subjective indicator: the opinions of citizens about the accessibility of the centre of a large city.
Description
In this report, objective and subjective indicators were recorded for groups of large cities. This involved a total of forty cities, the largest 30 (G30) and ten others. The accessibility of individual cities was also compared. To this end, the forty cities were divided into five more or less comparable groups.
Methodology
Extensive data were recorded in tabular form for each city in the Urban Accessibility Monitoring tables. In determining the objective indicators, OVG data covering the years from 1996 to 2003 and MON data for the year 2004 were used. MON stands for Mobility Research in the Netherlands, the successor to the OVG. For the subjective indicators, the data from a study carried out in 2004 specifically for this purpose was used to supplement the MON data.
What is the accessibility of the large cities according to the objective and subjective indicators?
Conclusions
The data indicates that travelling time has remained reasonably stable over the years. This holds true for travel by car, bicycle and public transport (OV). There is also still little difference in the travelling times during rush hour and during off-peak periods. Over the years, the cities within the Randstad conurbation have, with regard to travelling time, become slightly less easily accessible by car than the cities outside of the Randstad conurbation. The centres of the four largest cities (G4), based on the travelling time, are better accessible by public transport than by car when compared with the total urban area of the G4.
Based on this data, no clear relationship can be derived between the average travelling time and the opinion of the citizens with regard to accessibility. This is especially true for bicycle journeys. For journeys by car and, to a lesser extent, by public transport, some correlation between the objective and subjective indicators is apparent.
Contact info
The Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management
http://www.verkeerenwaterstaat.nl/?lc=uk&page=55
Publication date
01/08/2005
Researcher
M. van der Wel
Monitor stedelijke bereikbaarheid (PDF, Dut, 1 MB)
Tabellenboek monitor stedelijke bereikbaarheid (PDF, Dut, 1 MB)

Document type
research
Themes
Urban Policy > Transport and infrastructure > Roads and road transport
Keywords
Traffic management
 


-
Copyright-Masthead-Disclaimer-Privacy-RSS feed-EU-Eurocities-Urbact