.
BEdotCYdotDEdotDKdotESdotFIdotFRdotGRdotHUdotITdotLUdotNLdotPLdotPTdotROdotSEdotUKdot
 
European Urban Knowledge Network
Home eukn.org
 
Home > E-library > Urban Policy > Transport and infrastructure > Services & amenities > Public space > ...
 
Print pageContactSitemap
-
  • E-library
  • Share your knowledge!
  • Research Services
  • About EUKN
  • News
  • Meetings
-
-
-
-Search site
Zoeken

Advanced search
-
-
Cases

44 Common court ya...Renovation of the ...Living Cityspace –...more
Regeneration of pa...Green StreetsThreshold to the E...Campbell Square, L...SAUL and SAUL Plus...Urban tree managem...“Eye on Klarendal”...

Researches
Willingness to pay...Enhancing the use ...Local Leadership f...more
Liveability in Eng...The countryside in...Business Improveme...People make places...Public open space ...SuRaKu - Accessibl...GREENSPACE project...

Policies

It’s our space: a ...PAN80: The Control...Networks
European Urban Lan...Mobility for All N...
-
GREENSPACE project - predicting trips to urban parks
Introduction
Researchers from the Technological University in Eindhoven used a conjoint choice experiment to determine the relative importance of urban park attributes on people’s choice of park.
Description
Policy makers and planners typically make decisions regarding urban green space provisions without methodological or technical support, though this could help them assess the demands, needs and preferences of park users. By means of a conjoint choice model, researchers at the Technological University Eindhoven determined the relative importance of 22 attributes of urban parks (e.g. cleanliness, availability of lighting and presence of water) which influence park choice. In addition to presenting the average results, the researchers break down the results according to gender, household composition and age.
Background information
This research was part of the GREENSPACE project, an applied research project on green space in urban areas. The GREENSPACE project had the aim of demonstrating the contribution that urban green space makes to people’s quality of life. The project ran from 2001-2004.
The GREENSPACE project was carried out by a team of seven European partners:
  • University College Dublin;
  • Robert Gordon University / the Macaulay Institute in Aberdeen;
  • University of Surrey / University of Brighton;
  • the Eindhoven University of Technology;
  • University of Hohenheim in Stuttgart;
  • the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich;
  • the Autonomous University of Barcelona.
This research paper is chapter 5.2 of the GREENSPACE final report.
Methodology
The data for this study was collected by means of an internet survey which consisted of choice experiments.
The survey was carried out as follows:
  • On the basis of relevance, reliability and respondent burden, the researchers selected 22 urban park attributes, which were varied and combined into profiles describing various types of park.
  • From the almost 17 million possible profiles, the researchers selected 128 profiles, which were combined at random to create 128 choice sets.
  • Respondents were shown a randomly selected block of eight choice sets, which each consisted of two hypothetical urban parks. They were asked to allocate ten trips among these two parks.
  • Their responses were analysed using a multinomial logit model.
EU involvement
The GREENSPACE project was funded by the European Commission under the Key Action Environment and Sustainable Development of the EU Fifth Framework Programme.
Conclusions
The average results
  • Distance to the urban park is the most influential attribute, followed by size/type of park.
  • The availability of many facilities is not deemed very important.
  • The two least important attributes are ecological value of the park and the presence of benches and tables.
Gender specific results
  • Women seem to be less sensitive to distance.
  • Women show a higher relative preference for smaller parks and more passive activities, while men have a higher utility for the more active activities and bigger parks.
  • Women attach higher utilities to safety, maintenance and cleanliness, and also prefer a busier park.
Household-specific results
  • Households with children are less sensitive to distance.
  • They have a higher preference for more family-oriented activities.
  • They prefer parks with playgrounds.
Age-specific results
  • People that are older than forty are less sensitive to distance, prefer larger parks with trees and bushes and no water features, and prefer a possibility for walking the dog.
  • Older people have lower preference for accessibility to public transport, the option of sport activities, playgrounds for children and the availability of toilets.
Contact info
Technological University of Eindhoven
Prof. dr. Harry Timmermans (Professor of urban planning), tel. +31 40 2472274
Publication date
01/01/2005
Researcher
Dr. Maarten Ponje and Prof. dr. Harry Timmermans, Technological University of Eindhoven
Links
GREENSPACE ProjectTechnological University of EindhovenGeneral description of GREENSPACE project in EUKN e-library

GREENSPACE Final Report - Chapter 5.2 'Development of a conjoint choice model to predict trips to urban parks in Eindhoven' (PDF, Eng, 2.7MB)

Document type
research
Themes
Urban Policy > Transport and infrastructure > Services & amenities
Keywords
Public space
 


-
Copyright-Masthead-Disclaimer-Privacy-RSS feed-EU-Eurocities-Urbact