.
BEdotCYdotDEdotDKdotESdotFIdotFRdotGRdotHUdotITdotLUdotNLdotPLdotPTdotROdotSEdotUKdot
 
European Urban Knowledge Network
Home eukn.org
 
Home > E-library > Urban Policy > Urban environment > Urban renewal > City centre development > ...
 
Print pageContactSitemap
-
  • E-library
  • Share your knowledge!
  • Research Services
  • About EUKN
  • News
  • Meetings
-
-
-
-Search site
Zoeken

Advanced search
-
-
Cases

URBAN II MOLA DI B...URBAN II Taranto: ...The new opera hous...more
Living above shopsCommercial premise...George Street Quar...Threshold to the E...Leeds City Centre ...Rebuilding practic...Several commercial...

Researches
Rethinking the pol...Community Involvem...What makes a city?...more
What strategies ca...Brazil in the XXI ...Spreading the bene...A Right to Green, ...'A right to Green'...Urban restructurin...Higher Education i...

Policies

The URBAN II progr...Planning policy st...Aversa laboratory ...more
Assumptions for th...Urban development ...Plan to revitalize...
Networks
Cathedral cities n...
-
Example districts: six examples of socio-physical approach
Introduction
In the daily work world, experts, administrators, civil servants and residents are faced with spatial change processes, issues in the field of urban development and housing, socio-cultural and social changes and economic devaluation in the development of the districts. This report gives more insight into how these issues are dealt with in real-life operations.
Description
In the research, people from the districts were asked about the district development: "what works well here and why is that, what are the keys to success and where does it go wrong?"
As they work on developing districts, experts, administrators, civil servants and residents are faced with spatial alteration processes, issues in the field of urban development and housing, socio-cultural and social changes and economic devaluation. The report gives insight into district development in the following districts:
  • De Mare, Alkmaar;
  • De Heuvel, Breda;
  • Oud-Krispijn, Dordrecht;
  • Beijum-Oost, Groningen;
  • Malberg, Maastricht; and
  • Hoogvliet, Rotterdam.
Conclusions
  • The approaches show a great variation in initiatives taken by people-people with their own values, lifestyles and preferences.
  • It was apparent that a good and successful district development depends on enterprising and passionate residents and an equally enthusiastic staff of municipalities, corporations and other parties.
  • Strikingly, neither residents nor the civil servants, administrators and corporations involved distinguished between social, physical or economic policy in the districts.
  • The six districts chosen are certainly not the only districts where innovative, bold approaches occur. The districts  were selected based on the things learnt, the successes achieved and the differences in the phases of implementation of the district approach.
  • The report gives an overview of the 'critical factors' that are crucial in restructuring practices and of the ways in which they were handled in the example districts. In this way, one examines the themes of resident’s participation, dealing with flexibility, cooperation and financing.
Contact info
NovioConsult, tel. +31 24 381 33 33
Publication date
30/11/2003
Researcher
Opdam E., A. Voorburg, J. Kappe
Cities
The cities of Alkmaar, Breda, Dordrecht, Groningen, Maastricht and Rotterdam.
Links
NovioConsult (in Dutch)

Example districts (PDF, Dut, 720 KB)

Document type
research
Themes
Urban Policy > Urban environment > Urban renewal
Keywords
City centre development
 


-
Copyright-Masthead-Disclaimer-Privacy-RSS feed-EU-Eurocities-Urbact