.
BEdotCYdotDEdotDKdotESdotFIdotFRdotGRdotHUdotITdotLUdotNLdotPLdotPTdotROdotSEdotUKdot
 
European Urban Knowledge Network
Home eukn.org
 
Home > E-library > Urban Policy > Urban environment > Urban renewal > Urban restructuring > ...
 
Print pageContactSitemap
-
  • E-library
  • Share your knowledge!
  • Research Services
  • About EUKN
  • News
  • Meetings
-
-
-
-Search site
Zoeken

Advanced search
-
-
Cases

Renovation operati...Public private par...Tackling the Tarwe...more
Montauban urban re...Environmental rege...Urban pattern and ...Three roads to urb...Regeneration of a ...The Neighbourhood ...Rotterdam: Develop...

Researches
Compact City PolicyMinimalism in Urba...Creating Successfu...more
Surveyors in regen...Searching for Soli...Neighbourhood rege...Brazil in the XXI ...State aid control ...Urban development ...Social effect of r...

Policies

Local Revitalizati...Cyprus Strategic D...Local Revitalizati...more
Urban Development ...Housing Cooperativ...Long Term Jozsefva...Auswertung des Bun...Dokumentation zum ...A new commitment t...Urban Italia: expe...
Networks
The URBACT Regener...Mobility for All N...
-
The influence of urban restructuring on social cohesion
Introduction
Various research projects in the Netherlands and Great Britain showed that differentiation of residents in a district does not lead to social integration. The middle class does show interest in residences in restructured districts, but social relationships do not materialise.
Description
This research consisted of a literature search, in which the new definition of social cohesion was worked out based on three dimensions, and an analysis of the results of a survey. The surveys were conducted in the restructuring districts of Bouwlust in The Hague and Hoograven in Utrecht. In the analysis, they tried to answer the following research questions:
  • To what degree do people maintain social contacts with people in the district?
  • To what extent do people agree on how one should behave in the district?
  • To what degree does the district play a role in the identity of the residents?
  • How strong is the relationship between the three dimensions of social cohesion?
  • To what degree does social cohesion have a positive effect on the feeling of safety in the district and to what degree is there an inhibiting effect on the inclination to move house?
Conclusions
  • In districts where social mixing is applied the most, cohesion in the neighbourhood is the least. This is because the new housing in the (unpopular) districts is mainly used by people who want to move house again quickly.
  • There are no differences in social cohesion between new housing and old housing residents. Seeing that there is little contact between the groups, the researchers concluded that restructuring in terms of social cohesion has yielded little.
  • The perception component and the norms and values component are both important dimensions of social cohesion. These components should then also be considered in follow-up studies in addition to the traditional behaviour component.
Contact info
NETHUR
Publication date
01/05/2005
Researcher
Bolt, G. & M.I. Torrance
Cities
The cities of The Hague and Utrecht
Links
NETHUR

The influence of urban restructuring on social cohesion (PDF, Dut, 560 KB)

Document type
research
Themes
Urban Policy > Urban environment > Urban renewal
Keywords
Urban restructuring
 


-
Copyright-Masthead-Disclaimer-Privacy-RSS feed-EU-Eurocities-Urbact