“Local governments increasingly have to function within a multi-level European environment" 26-02-2008 “Local governments increasingly have to function within a multi-level
European environment”. As a result, new modes of co-operation, co-ordination and
interaction between local, national and European authorities are needed. Prof.
Dr. Joachim J. Hesse, renowned researcher in the field of political and
administrative sciences and director of the International Institute for
Comparative Government and European Policy in Berlin, is a strong promoter of
increased cross-border information exchange in Europe. This will allow
authorities at different levels to learn from each other and to improve their
efficiency and overall functioning. In his view, local governments, which are
becoming ever more important as a result of decentralisation and glocalisation,
could specifically benefit from such a broadened agenda.
What constitutes the political complexity of Europe?
“In Europe, we live in different constitutional environments, institutional settings and administrative traditions. Due to the failed attempts at constitutionalisation, the European Union is still to be characterised as being based on a patchwork of treaties. And at the national level, we find many different legal, political and institutional traditions, ranging from federal and unitary states to a whole variety of regional and local institutional arrangements. If one adds the multitude of regulatory provisions, the complexity is quite apparent.” How does this political and institutional diversity affect the
local level in Europe?
“Local governments increasingly have to function within this multi-level environment. From a European perspective, they are being influenced by various development programmes, such as the Lisbon Process, the EU Sustainability Approach or the Leipzig Charter. But also funding strategies or ecological directives are, of course, influential as regards their performance. And at the national level, implementation strategies, the re-allocation of tax revenues, and attempts at further decentralization directly affect local policies. Although we witness ongoing reforms in order to managerialise and optimize administrative routines, the governance of localities is, therefore, getting more complex. At the same time, the “weight” of local governments is growing as well as they are challenged by and impact upon further environments as a result of internationalisation and globalisation.“ What are the main conflict areas for local governments in Europe
today?
"Three major conflict areas seem to stand out: the future of the agglomerations, Stadt-Umland problems and the handling of the rural-urban divide. When it comes to agglomerations, one has to consider examples such as the Randstad, Rh ein-Main or the Ruhrgebiet. These areas are dealing with multifold problems, ranging from their internal organisation to territorial planning, neighbourhood relations and a clearly detectable crisis of multiculturalism. As regards Stadt-Umland problems, so different cities such as Arnhem,
Eindhoven, Oldenburg or even Berlin have to deal with asymmetric expenditure and
revenue levels, unbalanced basic services, planning conflicts with neighbouring
municipalities and growing social and territorial disparities. The regions, in
turn, take Friesland/Groningen/Drenthe vs. North-South Holland/Utrecht in the
Netherlands, face further migration towards urban agglomerations, increasing per
capita costs for infrastructure and basic services (in the periphery) and
social/political tensions, such as the danger of politically extremist movements
in remote and deprived areas.“
How should local governments deal with these kinds of
complexities?
"Local) authorities should focus more on co-ordination, co-operation and innovation. Increased co-operation between authorities is vital, both vertically as well as horizontally. Authorities should share responsibilities while dividing accountabilities. They also need to seek compliance instead of relying on traditional modes of ordering and control. And finally, a strict focus on outcome-oriented policy-formulation and implementation should almost be imperative.“ How could this increased cooperation between authorities at
different levels take form?
Links“We need a European-wide comparison of local/regional policy capacities; it ought to be well structured, organised and based on a continuous information exchange. The development of an input- and outcome-oriented benchmarking system should be promoted as well - as a comprehensive database containing vital documentation, not least on best practices. Increased networking and improved exchange between actors is of utmost importance in (and for) today’s quickly changing society. In sum, there is a need for a continuously updated comparison and cross-border “tracking“ of innovative local/regional policies. At the moment, we are not well equipped for comparative research on decentral government in Europe, even though it is greatly needed.” Click here to visit the website of the International Institute for Comparative Government and European Policy back |


