dot
dot
Search
 
 
United Kingdom
Home eukn.org
 
Home > News > Ecological footprint of a city does not coincide with i...
 
Print pageContactSitemap
-
  • E-library
  • News
  • Meetings
  • About EUKN
  • Partners
-
-
-
Cases

Alness Environment...Jigsaw North Liver...Rosemary’s Communi...more
Green StreetsTeesdale Environme...

Researches
Environmental Just...Seven Principles o...Greening Communiti...more
Skills for the Fut...Is the Grass Green...Streetscene and Pu...Prioritising local...

Policies

Housing in 2020PAN80: The Control...Planning policies ...more
SPP 21 Green Belts

-
-
Ecological footprint of a city does not coincide with its geographic footprint
03-04-2008

Over the past 20 years, urban planners, geographers, and environmentalists have pointed out the problems associated with sprawl development -  from traffic congestion to a spatial mismatch between where people live and where jobs are located to the high fiscal costs of an ever-expanding infrastructure. Solutions often focus on the internal urban environment, that is, on ways to create healthy, pedestrian-friendly cities with ample open space and human-scale design. Now a new body of research is emerging that considers not only an “inside” look at urban growth, but also its external impact on the global environment.
Canadian ecologist William Rees developed the concept of an “ecological footprint” to refer to the environmental impact of modern cities and industrial areas. The ecological footprint of a city is the surface area required to supply a city with food and other resources and to absorb its wastes.
However, the ecological footprint of a city no longer coincides with its geographic footprint.  “Twentieth century cities are dependent for survival and growth on a vast and increasingly global hinterland of ecologically productive landscapes,” explains Rees. Life in a modern city may require wheat from Russia or soy from Paraguay or American steel reprocessed in India. “Cities necessarily appropriate the ecological output and life support functions of distant regions all over the world through commercial trade,” according to Rees.
Calculating a city’s ecological footprint provides a rough measure of its natural resource requirements compared to available supply. Using Ree’s formulation, the ecological footprint of London is approximately 19.7 million hectares, or about 125 times its geographic area. Rees estimates that the ecological footprint per capita is three hectares in Europe and four to five hectares in North America -- but, worldwide, only one-and-a-half hectares of productive land are available per person.
Source: City Mayors
back


  dot
Copyright-Masthead-Disclaimer-PrivacydotRSS feed