Ecological footprint of a city does not coincide with its geographic footprint 03-04-2008 Over the past 20 years, urban planners, geographers, and environmentalists
have pointed out the problems associated with sprawl development - from traffic
congestion to a spatial mismatch between where people live and where jobs are
located to the high fiscal costs of an ever-expanding infrastructure. Solutions
often focus on the internal urban environment, that is, on ways to create
healthy, pedestrian-friendly cities with ample open space and human-scale
design. Now a new body of research is emerging that considers not only an
“inside” look at urban growth, but also its external impact on the global
environment.
Canadian ecologist William Rees developed the concept of an “ecological
footprint” to refer to the environmental impact of modern cities and industrial
areas. The ecological footprint of a city is the surface area required to supply
a city with food and other resources and to absorb its wastes.
However, the ecological footprint of a city no longer coincides with its
geographic footprint. “Twentieth century cities are dependent for survival and
growth on a vast and increasingly global hinterland of ecologically productive
landscapes,” explains Rees. Life in a modern city may require wheat from Russia
or soy from Paraguay or American steel reprocessed in India. “Cities necessarily
appropriate the ecological output and life support functions of distant regions
all over the world through commercial trade,” according to Rees.
Calculating a city’s ecological footprint provides a rough measure of its
natural resource requirements compared to available supply. Using Ree’s
formulation, the ecological footprint of London is approximately 19.7 million
hectares, or about 125 times its geographic area. Rees estimates that the
ecological footprint per capita is three hectares in Europe and four to five
hectares in North America -- but, worldwide, only one-and-a-half hectares of
productive land are available per person.
Source:
City
Mayors
back |


