dot
dot
Search
 
 
United Kingdom
Home eukn.org
 
Home > E-library > Urban Policy > Economy knowledge & employment > Urban economy > Employment > ...
 
Print pageContactSitemap
-
  • E-library
  • News
  • Meetings
  • About EUKN
  • Partners
-
-
-
Cases

Jigsaw North Liver...
Researches
What works for who...Evaluation of the ...Testing the impact...more
'Work Works' final...Worklessness in de...Impacts of the Job...Employment strateg...

-
-
Staying in work and moving up: evidence from the UK Employment Retention and Advancement demonstration - UK

Introduction
Explores the experiences and attitudes of participants in the Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) programme to explore how to ERA programmes work.
Description
Addresses the challenge of how to make employment retention and advancement programmes work. Describes the ERA programme as a research demonstration project testing the effectiveness of an approach to post-employment support. Studies people with either low rates of employment participation or extended periods not in work. Discusses the problems of work retention and work advancement. Explores respondents’ feelings about employment and their caring responsibilities. Examines attitudes towards retaining employment and considers respondents’ perspectives on job advancement.
Background information
ERA is a programme, which began serving customers in 2003 in six Jobcentre Plus districts in England, Scotland and Wales, offering a combination of employment counselling services and financial support to certain recipients of government benefits or lone parents claiming Working Tax Credit. Its purpose is to help people stabilise and improve their work situations. It aims to shift research emphasis away from work readiness and work entry to focus instead on concepts of retention and advancement. Aims to offer a foundation for understanding how receptive low-paid workers may be towards attempts to improve their labour market position through post-employment interventions.
Methodology
A research consortium was established, with three British organisations (Policy Studies Institute, Office for National Statistics, and Institute for Fiscal Studies) and a United States organisation (MDRC) working closely with the Department of Work and Pensions and Jobcentre Plus. Four research strands were identified: an impact study to determine ERA’s effectiveness; a process study to show how ERA operated and why certain outcomes may have arisen; a cost study to determine operational costs of the programme; and a cost-benefit study to compare the programme’s outcomes with operational costs.
Conclusions
Reinforces the importance of a bespoke approach, tailored to a customers’ individual retention and advancement needs. Contends that the individualised approach is a basic requirement for a well-designed employment service. Highlights the importance of finding the right kind of job for an individual to retain and advance in work.
Identifies three categories of ERA customers:
  • those with a positive approach, who may equally do well with or without ERA;
  • those with an ambivalent approach, who may respond to the advice ERA has to offer;
  • those who are advancement-resistant, whose reticence and lack of engagement is rooted in attitudes and values as well as the constraints of material circumstances.
Contact info
Policy Studies Institute
Lesley Hoggart (Senior Research Fellow), tel. +44 (0) 20 7911 7500
Publication date
14/09/2006
Project finished
//
Researcher
Lesley Hoggart et al; Policy Studies Institute
Article info
ISBN: 1847120881

Staying in work and moving up (PDF, Eng, 310 KB)

Document type
research
Themes
Urban Policy > Economy knowledge & employment > Urban economy
Keywords
Employment
 


  dot
Copyright-Masthead-Disclaimer-PrivacydotRSS feed