dot
dot
Search
 
 
United Kingdom
Home eukn.org
 
Home > E-library > Urban Policy > Urban environment > Seven Sides to Every Que...
 
Print pageContactSitemap
-
  • E-library
  • News
  • Meetings
  • About EUKN
  • Partners
-
-
-
Cases

Guidelines of Effe...Streets Ahead, Wid...Virtual Reality in...more
AccordiaRESTART - Renewabl...Generic skills in ...Ethnic Minority Yo...Development Partne...Designing a Health...Litter: Organising...

Researches
Cities LimitedAssessment of Trai...People Who Littermore
Neighbourhood Depr...Enterprise: Busine...The Planning Syste...The Planning Syste...Research on develo...Coherent Diversity...Scotland’s Constru...

Policies

Paved with gold: t...Designing our Envi...Spaces and buildin...more
Better public buil...London Bridge Busi...How to manage town...Planning policy st...

-
-
Seven Sides to Every Question? Towards effective inter-disciplinary action on sustainable development

Introduction
This project explored how different disciplines saw and evaluated local projects. Key aims were assessing ‘knowledge gaps’ and ‘language barriers’ and identify ways to improve inter-disciplinary understanding and co-operation in sustainable development.
Description
This short report is based on small, exploratory project tackling a very big issue – effective inter-disciplinary action on sustainable development. A specific objective of this particular project was to improve understanding of the knowledge and learning issues that might affect this work.
Background information
The project aims to work across the various disciplines involved in sustainable development at a local or neighbourhood level. Aims of this agenda include:
  • Assessing the ‘knowledge gaps’ and ‘language barriers’ that currently exist in multi-disciplinary work
  • Identifying opportunities to improve inter-disciplinary understanding and co-operation
  • Developing an inter-disciplinary framework for evaluation of local level work on sustainable development
  • Identifying, with the support of relevant professional bodies, common elements of evaluation criteria for locally-focused good practice that meets the needs of each discipline.
Methodology
The work was based around a set of discussion groups. Seven of these were discipline-specific and were assembled with the help of an organisation from that field. A final, wider discussion forum brought the different disciplines together.
Conclusions
A number of conclusions were made: a clear assessment of knowledge gaps between disciplines is essential; barriers seem to be most common among highly qualified professionals, institutions and traditions; there are some areas that are poorly understood.
Good communications is essential to better understanding – cutting out jargon and terminology. While local sustainability practitioners have a good understanding of the priorities of others and are keen to co-operate, this is often difficult due to their lack of core identity.
Focus areas to address problems:
  • relationships,
  • partnerships,
  • timing,
  • barriers and boundaries,
  • representation,
  • language and complexity.
Contact info
Community Development Foundation
admin@cdf.org.uk
Publication date
//
Project finished
//2004
Researcher
Chris Church, Ben Proctor of Ben Proctor Consulting, Jayne Humm at CDF, Gabriel Chanan, Alison Jarvis at JRF.
Links
Visit the Community Development Foundation website

Download the 'Seven Sides to Every Question?' Report (PDF, Eng, 265 KB)

Document type
research
Themes
Urban Policy
Keywords
Urban environment, Housing
 


  dot
Copyright-Masthead-Disclaimer-PrivacydotRSS feed